PackExpo International 2026 – Chicago, IL
October 18-21
Booth LU-8506

So, how do you choose the right type of thickness gauge when there are so many options on the market? To narrow the search, it will be important to consider the material to be tested, the application, and the precision required to meet any specific industry standards.
When working with compressible materials, a contracting method can be used to determine the thickness of a material. This type of method can characterize the thickness of a material when subjected to a compressive force over a given area. However, based on the material tested, there are critical parameters that need to be controlled to ensure accurate measurements. Often times with “snap”-type and manual gauges, the amount of pressure exerted can be directly influenced by the operator. Automatic, motorized instruments eliminate this user bias.
When considering a contacting type of micrometer, there are a variety of choices available including the simple “snap”-type gauges, benchtop manual gauges, and fully automatic electronic gauges. While all of these will provide a thickness measurement, some fall short of providing consistent results from operator to operator as the critical parameters cannot be controlled accurately.
Which micrometer is right for me? Consider these parameters when making your decision to help control these factors while eliminating significant operator bias:
Accuracy: Compare the stated accuracy with the testing methods you will be meeting. Will the instrument meet the needed tolerances? This will be important to determine changes in thickness between specimens.
Pressure Foot Diameter: Is the foot the right diameter? For compressible materials, a larger diameter is recommended to disperse the load over an area for more uniform pressure.

Contact Speed: The rate in which the pressure foot contacts the material needs to be controlled. A higher contact rate can result in lower thickness values.
Dwell Time: Controlling the dwell time is important as the longer a pressure foot remains in contact with materials, such as tissue paper, nonwovens, and high loft materials, can result in lower thickness measurements.

While “snap”-type and manual micrometers may appear to be a viable method for thickness measurements, they often fall short due to the lack of control over critical parameters resulting in poor product quality, inefficient raw material use, and product rejection. Automated micrometers eliminate operator influences and ensure accurate, repeatable test results.